financial problems

Threat to home equity

The biggest threat to home equity is impulse buying and keeping up appearances in a consumer society. Have you taken out a second mortgage even though you consider home equity your retirement nest egg? Many people run up credit card debt and then refinance it at a lower rate with a second mortgage. At some point, though, the nest egg disappears. Impulse buying and keeping up appearances can turn savers into spendthrifts.

Still, there is some justification for using a home as a savings vehicle. We all need to have a residence. The purpose of saving is to create a sense of financial security in our lives. Renters are subject to rent increases and the whims of landlords. A long-term saver able to pay a mortgage and not take out second and third mortgages will not have rent increases. A longterm saver able to pay off the mortgage will dramatically increase the sense of financial security in his life. Investors and speculators will have little interest in this type of security.

Home ownership works best for long-term savers who are not interested in the value of their home, but the security of their lifestyle. They are able to ignore the ups and downs of home prices, interest rates, and the economy, and focus on paying down the mortgage one payment at a time.

Often, true savers double their mortgage payments to eliminate the mortgage at a faster, orderly pace, whereas investors would not dream of using their excess cash to increase a mortgage payment.

Border Tax Issues and Options

While there are constant calls for special treatment of border communities, these calls are usually rejected by state legislatures for two reasons. First, special tax concessions in border communities raise constitutional issues in many states because otherwise equal citizens and firms are being treated unequally in state policy. Second, there is no obvious place to draw the lines around such policies. For example, a border municipality might be losing 25% of possible business to another state, another municipality in the same county might be losing 10%, the whole county 12%, and a neighboring county 8%. There is a difficult issue of whether to use special border taxes just in municipalities on the border, in entire counties, etc. No matter where the line is drawn, it creates a border problem for the first county not given special treatment. If
taxes are dropped in Border County to match a neighboring state, then Near-Border County residents have a new incentive to do business in Border County.